Home Blog Page 169

Centrist getting their ducks in a row for local election loss: Dame Margaret Hodge already blaming Corbyn

Labour set to lose 59 seats in ‘Red Wall’ councils next week but Hodge got her excuses in before a single result is called.

Voters across the country will head to the polls on 6 May as part of a ‘Super Thursday’ of local authority, devolved parliamentary, and mayoralty elections being held across Britain.

Among the list of councils holding elections are many in the North and Midlands containing constituencies where the Conservatives won seats from Labour at the 2019 general election, such as Bury, Dudley, Wolverhampton, Northumberland, and Durham.

Labour are certainly on the descent in the Heartlands and it’s not gravity that’s crashing the Party to the ground. This has been a continued descent since Blair lost Scotland.

There was a short reprieve with Corbyn’s one man campaign in the 2017 general election that held back this ebbing tide for a short time.

It’s never been a lack of socialist values from the former Labour-supporting population or a shift to the right that’s causing this exodus.

There is a sense of betrayal felt by Red wall voters. The continued assault and berating on Leave-voting socialist will have a price to pay. There is a disenfranchisement that people feel up north it doesn’t help to have a weathercock leader so disconnected from the people or at least those outside his middle-class circle or more so those that call the tune he promptly dances to.

Where it is true Corbyn had many faults, it is true to say he was more than adequate at inspiring the masses. Without Corbyn Labour does not have the ability to create a coherent vision of a more equal society, one where everyone has a fair opportunity to succeed, instead, we are presented with the best of two evils, Tories or Tory-lite. The establishment has decread socilisim in any form wiil never allowed a foothold in the UK and for this reason, Corbyn will be further villainised by the centrist, a constant scapegoat by the lesser of two evils.

This right-wing Labour Party are preparing for defeat and ready to blame anyone but themselves.

Even before the results of this weeks coming local elections Dame Margaret Hodge got her licks in and pointed the finger directly at Jeremy Corbyn for the predicted Labour losses.

Sky’s Sophie Ridge asked Dame Hodge the direct question regarding Sir Keir Starmer’s Labour Party’s polling position while pointing out the likelihood of losing another Red Wall seat and historic Labour constituency of Hartlepool.

Dame Hodge was quick of the mark to blame both the 2019 general election result and Jeremy Corbyn, Hodge claimed Labour needed to build up trust, on that we all agree but to suggest any pending losses for Labour fall at Jeremy Corbyn feet is at best spiteful but in reality, just another excuse for the fact Labour has cooked its own Goose when it comes to the Leave voting constituencies up North.

We all warned you this would happen.

However, Starmer understood that fact, when he pushed his second referendum manifesto onto Labour knowing full well that over 60% of its constituencies voted to leave the EU. The shame is that so many good former MPs and councillors in the Labour Heartlands have had to suffer for his ambitions or more to the point his mission.

When the results are in and the worst is realised those still true to the working-class socialist foundations and principles of the Labour Party should hold Starmer to account and remove him.

Labour’s only chance in the future is to turn LeFT


UK to pay historic debt of £400m in deal to free Nazanin Zaghari-Ratcliffe

0

Nazanin Zaghari-Ratcliffe, the British Iranian mother jailed in Iran three years ago on espionage charges, could be released as part of a prisoner exchange

Quoting an anonymous official, a state broadcaster said deals had been reached with both Britain and the US in order to release prisoners with Western links held in Iran.

It was said the UK had agreed to pay the £400m debt over the non-delivery of tanks dating back to the 1970s.

The US was said to have agreed a prisoner swap in exchange for the release of $7bn (£5bn) of frozen Iranian funds, but Washington did also not immediately acknowledge any deal.

“The release of Nazanin Zaghari-Ratcliffe in exchange for the UK’s payment of its £400m debt to Iran has also been finalised,” the official said.

It comes just days after Mrs Zaghari-Ratcliffe was sentenced to another year in prison on charges of “propaganda activities against the regime” in Iran.

Potential prisoner exchange.

An Iranian official also says a deal with the US will see a prisoner swap in exchange for the release of $7bn frozen Iranian funds.

Iran’s Foreign Minister Mohammad Javad Zarif said in April while speaking at an Asia Society event in New York, he had the authority to initiate a wide-ranging exchange, involving prisoners in Iran and those held by the United States or third countries.
In response to a question from the audience, Iran’s top diplomat contrasted the case of Zaghari-Ratcliffe, a charity worker who was arrested in April 2016, with the case of an Iranian he said was detained in Australia.

“We have an Iranian woman in Australia who gave birth to a child in prison… on an extradition request by the United States because she was responsible as a translator in a … purchase operation … of some transmission equipment for Iranian broadcasting company, that’s her charge,” the minister said.”Now we hear about Nazanin Zaghari and her child, and I feel sorry for them, and I’ve done my best to help, but nobody talks about this lady in Australia,” Zarif said.

Zarif said there were several people detained in the US, or in allied nations, on so-called “phoney” charges. He suggested they be traded for prisoners in Iran whom the US and allies believe are being held on spurious charges. “So what can I do as a foreign minister? I put this offer on the table, publicly, now. Exchange them.

All these people that are in prison — inside the United States, on extradition request from the United States. “Let’s have an exchange. I”m ready to do it, and I have authority to do it. We’ve informed the government of the United States six months ago that we are ready. Not a response yet. If they tell you something else, they’re lying.”

A Foreign Office spokesman said: “We continue to explore options to resolve this 40-year-old case and will not comment further as legal discussions are ongoing.”

Labour MP Tulip Siddiq said her family had “heard nothing” to confirm reports she may be released.

Mrs Zaghari Ratcliffe’s constituency MP for Hampstead and Kilburn tweeted: “I am aware there are news reports circulating about the debt being paid to #FreeNazanin. I have spoken to her family and they have heard nothing confirming any of these rumours.

“It was however welcome to hear Dominic Raab refer to her torture this morning on Marr. I hope the Government is doing all it can to get the hostages home.”

A medical assessment carried out for the human rights charity Redress found Mrs Zaghari-Ratcliffe, from West Hampstead, had post-traumatic stress disorder from her treatment in Iranian prisons and the uncertainty about her fate.

She was released in March due to the coronavirus crisis and has been living under house arrest. She has not yet been taken back to prison and plans to appeal against the latest conviction.

Her daughter, Gabriella, was with her mother when she was arrested and returned to the UK in 2019 to begin school.

The six-year-old has not yet been told about her mother’s latest prison sentence, with Mr Ratcliffe saying he felt it would be better to wait until she has to return to jail before breaking the news.

Never mind Captain hindsight Starmer’s like Captain Ahab steering the Labour Party into its doom while obsessing over wallpaper

No one needs the polls to tell them how badly Labour are doing.

After eleven years of Tory rule Labour should be preparing itself for power. The Party should have a coherent articulated vision of what a Labour-run Britain would look like, for a democratic socialist Party that is not such a tall order, it usually starts with an idea of equality while giving everyone access to the tools in life to help them succeed no matter their circumstances.

Followed by an industrial strategy of investment and jobs never mind the popular support for nationalisation of Rail, mail and utilities or real investment into the NHS while creating partnerships and public ownership of the pharmaceutical section and suppliers of medical and PPE equipment, helping to secure the good health of all UK citizens going forward.

Unfortunately, no matter which version or vision of a Labour-led future Starmer is doing a terrible job.

It’s either the result of his incompetence, lack of political experience, along with an absence of vision, no policies and the sheer fact that people just don’t like him, all of which combined are part and parcel of Labour crashing on the rocks; or he is doing an excellent job and his mission to crash the Labour Party on the rocks is working a treat.

It’s not as if the Tories have not given Starmer opportunity after opportunity to highlight their incompetence and mismanagement of every aspect of government.  

There are so many incidents and issues that Sir Keir Starmer could bring to the front, to emphasise to the public the nature of this Kleptocracy of a Tory government and Johnson’s regime.

There is a year of bad decisions that have resulted in over a hundred thousand covid deaths, extended lockdowns that if handled differently could well have been avoided, an oven-ready Brexit deal that tasted like a poor microwaved snack-pot but it seems the Barrister that Starmer actually is, wants to pursue a legal attack on Boris Johnson and the Tories.

There are so many other things Starmer could and should use to bring the Tories down, who funded the decorating of Johnson’s fault while adding weight to the pile is insignificant when we look at the bigger picture. The loss of lives, the cronyism, the fact that thousands have lost their jobs, the reality of poverty Britain and escalating use of food banks.

Any other leader would be 20 points ahead

Obsessing over wallpaper will not bring the Tories down, offering an alternative just might.

While the public are aware of the scandal surrounding Boris Johnson, they aren’t as yet moved in terms of their voting intention

Scandal-hit Boris Johnson has seen his favourability ratings remain unchanged, while Keir Starmer’s sink

The monthly survey – carried out between 16-22 April, before the latest allegations made by Johnson’s former key adviser Dominic Cummings were made public – put the Tories on 40%, three points clear of Labour who are on 37%, down from 38%, the Liberal Democrats on 8% (up from 6%), and the Greens unchanged at 5%.

A second poll released on Monday found the Conservatives had a 10-point lead over Labour, with both parties unchanged compared to the previous week. The survey of 2,000 voters by the consultancy firm Redfield & Wilton Strategies found that 44% of people said they would vote Tory if there was an imminent general election, while 34% would vote Labour.

This week, we recorded figures of 44% Conservative and 33% for Labour.

It’s hard to look at those numbers and conclude anything but an apparently confusing and contradictory state of affairs: the public very much know what’s going on, and know that a series of scandals currently surround the Prime Minister, but it has changed very few minds on the man himself or his party.

Unfortunately for the UK, the opposition leader is just paying lip service in his attacks on the Tories. His main obsession seems to be an all-out attack on the Left while at the same time making the Labour Party unelectable.

Starmer’s inability to articulate a competent alternative to the Tories lets down all those good Labour members and more so the councillors fighting to win their seats in the local elections.

Labour made the election about the NHS and nurses pay, for the locals that just doesn’t hold water.

The sleaze allegations have done little to nudge the numbers in Labour’s favour. Labour’s campaign has been incoherent, lacklustre and dishonest, no matter how many Labour councillors win seats, none of them has the gift to give nurses a pay rise or fund the NHS, honesty would have involved a promise to give local authority care workers a pay rise but that would actually mean doing something.

Labour had the opportunity to make real gains this May but I predict they are on a hiding to nothing.

The only thing that could have saved Labour was a clear articulated vision of the future with life-changing alternative policies, not a choice of two evils

If Starmer and his team actually stopped to listen to people they would have understood the same things that concerned them before the pandemic still concerned them today. Some of those things a strong Labour councils could have made a defence, such as food banks, housing, organising communities, better placing them to support each other through the current and future environments and most of all hitting back on the ongoing austerity cuts, luckily the Trade Unionist and Socialist Coalition (TUSC) are fielding over 330 candidates, all on a mandate of fighting austerity and council cuts.

The aftermath of next week’s elections in England, Scotland and Wales will leave Labour asking a lot of hard questions, however, we all know the answer from Starmer when he fails to make ground will be ‘its the aftermath of the Corbyn tenure, we are still picking up the pieces from the 2019 general election result’.

This will be the golden opportunity for the ship’s crew to ditch the Captain, the Captain hell-bent on seeing the good ship Labour crash into the rocks.

When Starmer’s Labour walked through the division lobbies alongside the Tories in support of Johnson’s Brexit trade deal at the end of 2020, the Remainers dropped support for him now only 48% of Remain voters would choose Labour, down from 58% in December.

Starmer rode a wave of Remain populism but since his takeover of the Leadership, he has cast aside the Remainers, their job of undermining Corbyn and propelling him to the leadership done.

A truth Starmer has shadow Brexit secretary has never faced was the collapse of the Labour vote was not down to socialist policies or Jeremy Corbyn but a direct result of his own vote losing second referendum policy, a policy that witnessed England losing 52 leave voting seats out of the total 54 lost.

Unfortunately for Labour, Starmer’s efforts at making overtures to the Leave-voting Labour Heartlands that old Red wall has fallen on deaf ears and will continue to do so.

Within the Labour Heartlands Starmer was directly blamed for the vote losing second referendum in 2019.

This remains true today and is why ‘Red Wall’ areas will not fall readily back to Labour hands in council and mayoral elections next week.

At the end of April, polls show Labour dropping like a stone people sticking with Labour has dropped from 88% to 81%.

This seven point drop is a significant number – it could represent over 800,000 people who voted Labour in 2019 deserting the party.

Next weeks results will also belong to Starmer the question left standing is will Labour allow this political grifter to crash its ship into the rocks either by design or incompetence.

Labour MP Janet Daby reveals a 3-year long wait for outcome of racism and sexism complaint

0

Labour MP Janet Daby reveals there’s a long wait for the outcome of any racism and sexism complaint

Janet Daby has revealed she is still waiting for the outcome of a racism and sexism complaint she made nearly three years ago.

Daby said the alleged incident in 2018 made her feel as though she “did not belong here”.

Her case is “yet to be resolved,” she told MPs through a video link.

“I had a completely demoralising encounter,” said the politician

Janet Dab Labour MP for Lewisham East has been waiting almost three years for resolution to a complaint she made about racism and sexism, early in her political career.

Janet Dab was keen to raise the issue of discrimination against black, Asian and minority ethnic people, as MPs discussed the parliamentary complaints system on Wednesday, April 28.

Speaking in the House of Commons, Daby said: “I had a completely demoralising encounter when I was relatively new to this House.

“I was made to feel as though I did not belong here, and I feel that this was because of my gender as well as my ethnicity. Although this happened almost three years ago and I went through the formal complaints system, it is still yet to be resolved.

“Does this tell us tackling racial discrimination is a priority for the ICGS (Independent Complaints and Grievance Scheme)?”

Daby emphasised that cases must be addressed in a timely fashion, with care and sensitivity

She highlighted a report by ParliReach, a workplace equality network from 2019, which found that their members were “reluctant to speak up when they felt discriminated against”.

In this report, it was also pointed out that non-desk staff, such as cleaners might face particular problems when making complaints.

The MP for Lewisham East said: “If their only option is to report something to their manager, who might themselves be the problem, it is not serving their needs.”

MPs have now approved a change to parliament’s complaints system which means that from next year allegations of harassment or bullying cannot be raised if the incident took place more than a year ago.

This does not however, apply to complaints about sexual misconduct.

‘Sexual misconduct’

The ICGS scheme was introduced in 2018, following allegations of bullying and harassment in Parliament.

Then Commons leader Andrea Leadsom said the new code would make sure everyone “is respected and valued” and would introduce “effective sanctions” for those breaking the rules.

The rules made clear there was a “zero-tolerance approach to bullying, harassment and sexual misconduct”, she stated.

In her speech, Ms Daby highlighted a 2019 report from ParliREACH, Parliament’s equalities network, which she said showed “the scale of difficulties that people from diverse backgrounds face”.

Staff working in the Commons, she said, “reported having their presence questioned and equal opportunities denied. ParliREACH said that many of its members were reluctant to speak up when they felt discriminated against”.

This, she said, was mainly because staff were worried about being seen to “call the race card”.

In February, an 18 month review into how well the ICGS was functioning was completed, and found “much progress” had been made, but raised concerns of operation and process, as well as equal access for diverse groups.

Ms Daby was speaking at a debate for changing the rules on reporting complaints to the Parliamentary Authorities.

Under the new rules, complaints will only be able to be made up to a year after alleged incidents happen, although this time limit does not apply to complaints of sexual misconduct.

A spokesperson for the Houses of Parliament said “this is not something we can comment on”, but they added that Ms Daby’s complaint was not being handled as an ICGS case, but was being dealt with “under a separate internal process”.

In 2018, Amnesty carried out research that looked into abuse against women politicians and journalists on Twitter.

It found that black women were 84% more likely to be mentioned in abusive or problematic tweets.

High Court judge ordered Matt Hancock to hand over texts and WhatsApp messages about lucrative Covid-19 contracts

Government used exclusive WhatsApp group to give ‘VIP’ CEOs info about PPE deals

The Government used an exclusive WhatsApp group to give “VIP” company CEOs information about its PPE requirements, a court has been told.

A High Court judge today ordered Matt Hancock to hand over texts and WhatsApp messages about lucrative Covid-19 contracts.

The Good Law Project has been pursuing the government in the High Court to reveal details of the ‘VIP’ fast lane for Covid contracts.

The High Court said the Government should carry out additional searches for:

(1)   texts and WhatsApp messages for some selected civil servants; and
(2)   instructions, directions and decisions by Ministers in respect of the establishment, selection and criteria of the VIP lane.

It also said that the Government should supply details of the advice given by Emily Lawson in relation to FFP2 facemasks.

Evidence brought up in court today suggests the government used a WhatsApp group of 200 company CEOs to “provide special communications (apparently unavailable to other suppliers) about its forecast PPE requirements.”

The existence of the group was revealed for the first time today, in a meeting agenda from last April, disclosed to the court by the Government.

It reads: “[Redacted] to connect with [Redacted] and confirm preferred way forward to sharing communications with CEOs and CPOs (Chief product officers)

“Note: There is a WhatsApp group with [circa] 200 CEO and this is informal way to communicate. There is also a separate channel to CPOs)”

A second group included purchasing officers of the firms.

But Government lawyers have so far failed to disclose any text or instant messages to the court.

Today the court ordered Mr Hancock to search for and disclose “texts and WhatsApp messages for some selected civil servants.”

The Government were also ordered to pay the Good Law Project’s legal costs.

A spokesperson for the Project said: “We believe we are left in a position of being unable fairly to interrogate and challenge the account given by Government in its evidence.”

Cashing in on Covid: More names added to the list.

The Good Law Project today revealed the names of four more companies awarded contracts through the VIP lane: Clandeboye Agencies, P14 Medical, Luxe Lifestyle and Meller Designs.

These four are in addition to Ayanda, which enjoyed a £252m deal negotiated by Liz Truss adviser Andrew Mills. And Pestfix which won approximately £350m in contracts despite being described by Government as a company “which specialises in pest control products, that was dormant in 2018” (see page 73). There remain a further 41 firms yet to be revealed.

Good Law Project can also reveal that of the nine contracts the subject of the judicial review – one with Ayanda, two with Clandeboye and six with Pestfix – five or possibly six of them have failed in the sense that some or all of the PPE provided under them has proved unfit for its intended purpose (see page 2). Hundreds and hundreds of millions of pounds – spent with these three suppliers alone – have been wasted. It is inconceivable that this is the only waste. Moreover, the documents disclose that Pestfix and Matt Hancock are “in legal dispute” (see page 176).

In relation to Ayanda, civil servants were afraid of losing the contract with Ayanda because Andrew Mills “has close ties to DIT so wouldn’t be a good outcome” (see page 188), were concerned that Andrew Mills “is using previous relationships and making noise that we are not responsive” (page 190), and “Andrew comes through as highly backed as he sits on the board for DIT – so I don’t want things being escalated” (page 191). 

The court heard last week that civil servants had complained they were “drowning” in requests for companies with links to politicians and senior officials wanting to “jump the queue” for lucrative PPE contracts.

Government staff warned that fast-tracking firms “has a knock on effect to the remaining offers of help”, according to emails revealed in court.

More than half of Sir Keir Starmer’s Peterborough Labour Party councillors suspended over alleged anti-Semitism.

Upon his election as Labour leader last year, Sir Keir Starmer pledged to eradicate anti-Semitism, how disappointing he must be to the Jewish community.

Cases of anti-Semitism along with the piled up cases of alleged anti-Semitism was placed at the foot of the former leader Jeremy Corbyn as if he was personally responsible for the comments made on social media himself. The now buried #LabourLeaks showed how some within the party weaponised peoples comments to give a negative impression on Corbyn, however, here we are a year on, this is clearly Sir Keir Starmer’s issue and yet another broken promise he made.

More than half of the Labour Party’s Peterborough councillors suspended over alleged anti-Semitism.

The Labour party has been forced to suspended 16 members in the Peterborough and the North West Cambridgeshire Constituency Local Party over complaints of anti-Semitism, a figure which includes nine sitting councillors and seven activists.

Seven of the party’s elected representatives have been suspended just weeks after two other councillors had the Labour whip withdrawn. It means nine of the party’s 17 councillors in Peterborough have been suspended over the past month.

A party spokesperson confirmed on Wednesday that the party had taken the decision to suspend the 14 individuals following complaints about antisemitic conduct.

They added that they have taken the action now ahead of the May 6 election as part of the leadership’s “determination to root out all forms of antisemitism form our party and it is testament to our commitment to zero tolerance that we will not be influenced by an election timetable.”

It is understood that among those administratively suspended by the party and facing investigation into allegations including antisemtism are Councillor Ansar Ali, Richard Stargward, Cllr Angus Ellis, Colin and Linda Watson, Cllr Samantha Hemraj, Kit Hubback, Cllrs Mahboob Hemraj , Cllr Shabina Qayyum, Cllr Aasiayah Joseph and Cllr Mohammed Jamil from Peterborough CLP.

Those suspended from North Cambridgeshire CLP included Janet Armstrong and Jonathan Orchard.

Labour said they would not be commenting further on the investigations into allegations of antisemitism at this time.

As revealed by the Peterborough Telegraph, Labour recently suspended Cllrs Ed Murphy (Ravensthorpe) and Heather Skibsted (Orton Longueville) while it investigates complaints made against the pair, although the nature of the complaints were not revealed.

That means in total, nine of the party’s 17 councillors have been administratively suspended in the past month.

Leader of the council’s Labour group, Cllr Shaz Nawaz, declined to comment when approached by the PT.

Peterborough Labour has in recent years had issues with antisemitism after it previously selected a council election candidate – Alan Bull – despite allegedly knowing he had been accused of denying the Holocaust.

Mr Bull has always denied being antisemitic and has called on the Labour Party to “correct the record and apologise for misrepresenting my character and causing considerable distress to my family and me”.

Moreover, former Labour MP Lisa Forbes, standing in Fletton & Woodston in next week’s elections, apologised after she liked a post on Facebook that described Theresa May keeping her “Zionist Slave Masters agenda alive”.

The Peterborough Today local news outlet also revealed this week alleged antisemitic posts from sitting Conservative councillor Mohammed Nadeem (North) and two former party candidates (Muhammad Ikram and Haq Nawaz) which were criticised by the Jewish Leadership Council.

For many people one thing is clear, they want to show support solidarity and empathy for an oppressed people, the Palestinians.

Many would argue the word Zionist is not antisemitic, after all, the UN labelled Zionism and zionist as racist not so long ago United Nations General Assembly Resolution 3379, adopted on 10 November 1975 by a vote of 72 to 35 (with 32 abstentions), “determined that Zionism is a form of racism and racial discrimination “

The determination that “Zionism is a form of racism and racial discrimination”, contained in the resolution, was revoked in 1991 with UN General Assembly Resolution 46/86 however I have yet to read the term is antisemitic.

If any form of expression or words when trying to identify the oppression carried out on the Palestinian people is deemed antisemitic within the Labour party then soon there will be no Labour party

Arlene Foster to stand down as North’s First Minister and DUP leader

She will step down from party leadership at end of May and Stormont position the following month

Mrs Foster said it had been the privilege of her life to “serve the people of Northern Ireland as their first minister and to represent my home constituency of Fermanagh/South Tyrone”.

“My election as leader of the Democratic Unionist Party broke a glass ceiling and I am glad to inspired other women to enter politics and spurred them on to take up elected office,” Mrs Foster said.

“I understand the misogynistic criticisms that female public figures have to take and sadly it’s the same for all women in public life.

“I want to encourage you to keep going and don’t let the online lynch mobs get you down.”

It comes after 75% of the Democratic Unionist Party‘s (DUP) Northern Ireland Assembly members signed a letter demanding a leadership contest.https://f2c04b76dca851348269de134ba530c3.safeframe.googlesyndication.com/safeframe/1-0-38/html/container.htmlAdvertisement

Eight of the party’s 18 constituency associations submitted letters of concern over the leadership’s handling of the Northern Ireland Protocol and other issues.

Mrs Foster played down the threat when speaking to reporters yesterday afternoon, saying: “Stories on leadership come up from time to time, and it’s one of those times.”

On Wednesday afternoon, she released a statement saying that she would step down as leader of the DUP on 20 May and as first minister of Northern Ireland at the end of June.

Mrs Foster, in the six minute statement, reflected on an 18-year career in the Stormont Assembly, saying how proud she was of her achievements.

She said: “I am the first to recognise that there have been ups and downs over this last five and a half years (as party leader). The 2016 assembly election results and our party’s best ever Westminster result in 2017, stand out amongst the high points…

“Of course, along with the highs, there have been lows along the way. The three years without devolution caused untold harm to our public services.

“I am proud that there is a young generation of Democratic Unionists getting involved in politics and trying to shape Northern Ireland for the better.

“Over the last 12 months, I’ve been holding online meetings with young people, mainly from working class communities and encouraging them, especially the young women, to get involved. And I echo that encouragement today. Politics and debate is the only path to affect change in society.”

Mrs Foster has endured a turbulent time as DUP leader and the fall-out from Brexit – which the party supported – has put particular pressure on the party’s top brass as it faces having to weather the storm caused by the Northern Ireland Protocol, which imposed a border down the Irish Sea.

It has also been suggested recent changes to NI’s abortion laws and the commitment to implement an Irish language act were causing concerns with some elected DUP representatives ahead of next year’s assembly election.

DUP deputy leader Nigel Dodds, whose resignation has also been demanded by the party’s councillors, tweeted: “Arlene has dedicated her life to defending the Union and moving Northern Ireland forward. She has demonstrated great courage and is an example for women in public life.

“Thank you Arlene. It’s been a privilege to work alongside you.”

– Additional reporting PA

Electoral Commission to investigate Boris Johnson’s Downing Street flat renovations

The Electoral Commission has launched an investigation into funding of works on Boris Johnson’s Downing Street flat.

Boris Johnson has insisted he “covered the costs” of the refurbishment of his Downing Street flat as a formal investigation was launched into the revamp.

The Electoral Commission said today that it would look into whether any transactions related to the works on the prime minister’s flat – above 11 Downing Street – were properly reported.

The spending watchdog said there were “reasonable grounds to suspect that an offence or offences may have occurred”.

Boris Johnson has been under growing pressure to declare how refurbishments were paid for after his ex-adviser said there was a plan for donors to “secretly pay”.

Mr Johnson told MPs he covered the revamp “personally” – but would not say who paid the initial bill.

While it is not against the rules to receive donations, politicians must declare them so the public can see who has given them money and whether it has had any influence on their decisions.

The Commission – which regulates party and election finance – has the power to investigate if such funding has been declared properly and can impose fines or pass on allegations to the police if they see fit.

Earlier this week Boris Johnson asked top civil servant Simon Case to review how the refurbishment of his Downing Street flat was paid for.

Cabinet Secretary Simon Case told MPs he had not been “involved directly” in the works, but would examine the issue.

Mr Johnson’s ex-adviser Dominic Cummings has claimed the PM once planned to have donors “secretly pay” for the revamp.

The PM has said any relevant donations will be declared “in due course”.

Labour called on the Electoral Commission, which regulates political donations in the UK, to launch a formal investigation.

Prime Minister’s Questions on Wednesday, Labour’s Sir Keir Starmer pushed the PM to explain who paid for the initial invoice for renovations – giving him “multiple choice” answers between the taxpayer, the Conservative Party, a private donor or Mr Johnson himself.

Boris Johnson vs Sir Keir Starmer: PMQs Sleaze accusations

Sir Keir Starmer accused the government of being “mired in sleaze, cronyism and scandal”.

But in the fiery exchange, Mr Johnson replied: “The answer is I have covered the costs… I conformed in full with the code of conduct and officials have kept advising me through this whole thing.

“But I think people will think it is absolutely bizarre that he is focusing on this issue when what people want to know is what plans the government might have on improving the life of people in this country.”

The Electoral Commission has been in contact with the Conservative Party since March over the works the PM carried out to No 11.

A spokesman for the watchdog said its newly launched investigation would “determine whether any transactions relating to the works at 11 Downing Street fall within the regime regulated by the Commission and whether such funding was reported as required”.

Coronavirus: India is struggling to breathe while the Blackmarket makes a killing on oxygen

As India fights a devastating second wave of Covid-19 that is killing thousands each day, international efforts to help tackle the crisis are hastening, with both Britain and the United States pledging aid and much-needed medical supplies.

The second wave, which began in March, has escalated rapidly, with India recording more than a million new cases in just three days. For the past two weeks, medical facilities have been running out of oxygen and ICU beds, with patients left outside hospitals waiting for care.

On Monday, India reported 352,991 new cases and 2,812 virus-related deaths, marking the world’s highest daily caseload for the fifth straight day.

While India is breaking another global Covid-19 record that can be registered not just in numbers but real human misery, hurt sorrow and despair, hospitals are in a desperate state, rapidly running out of oxygen.

With heart-wrenching images from India and climbing death tolls making global headlines, countries around the world have stepped up to offer critical aid.

International efforts to help tackle the crisis are hastening, with both Britain and the United States pledging aid and much-needed medical supplies, other countries are now following the example.

European Commission chief Ursula von der Leyen tweeted that the organisation was “pooling resources to respond rapidly to India’s request for assistance”.

France and Germany also promised rapid support. Neighbouring rival Pakistan offered medical equipment and supplies after Prime Minister Imran Khan tweeted prayers for a “speedy recovery”.

The irony is not missed when you realise India is at the centre of global vaccine manufacturing

Indian drug companies are major manufacturers of vaccines distributed worldwide.

Women mourn the death of a family member, who died from the coronavirus disease (COVID-19), outside a crematorium in New Delhi, India April 24, 2021. REUTERS/Adnan Abidi

“Hoarding of injections like remdesivir and oxygen in homes is creating a panic and this hoarding is causing a shortage of these medicines,” said Dr Randeep Guleria, the director of India’s Institute of Medical Sciences, in a statement released by the ministry of health on Sunday night.

Guleria said most people should not need to be treated with oxygen and holding it in private homes could reduce availability for critical patients He emphasised, too, that Remdesivir was no “magic bullet”.

Unlike the UK with its ordered corruption and cronyism carried out amongst politicians, their donors, and of course, Tory friends and family. India in all the missilry of covid is seeing another form of depravity that of the Blackmarket.

The terrible situation in India is seeing a rise in Black marketeers praying on this human misery and the life-saving asset the profiteers are cashing in on is oxygen.

The situation is particularly dire in the capital New Delhi, which is under lockdown until May 3.

Multiple funeral pyres of victims of COVID-19 burn at a ground that has been converted into a crematorium for mass cremation in New Delhi, India, Saturday, April 24, 2021. Indian authorities are scrambling to get medical oxygen to hospitals where COVID-19 patients are suffocating from low supplies.
AP/Altaf Qadri

The city is facing severe oxygen shortages. Delhi does not produce its own oxygen and relies on resources supplied by the central government, according to Delhi’s Chief Minister Arvind Kejriwal.

Several Delhi hospitals tweeted SOS messages over the weekend appealing for oxygen supplies. On Saturday, at least 20 critically ill patients died after oxygen supply was delayed at one Delhi hospital.

In a tweet Sunday, Prime Minister Narendra Modi said his administration will set up 551 oxygen generation plants “in every district to ensure adequate oxygen availability.”

The central government has come under fierce criticism within the country for its handling of the outbreak, which has seen overwhelmed hospitals and residents post pleas on social media for more supplies from state and federal officials.

Many have turned to the black market in a desperate attempt to save their loved ones.

Anshu Priya could not get a hospital bed in Delhi or its suburb of Noida for her father-in-law and as his condition continued to deteriorate. She spent most of Sunday looking for an oxygen cylinder but her search was futile.

So she finally turned to the black market. She paid a hefty amount – 50,000 rupees ($670; £480) – to procure a cylinder that normally costs 6,000 rupees. With her mother-in-law also struggling to breathe, Anshu knew she may not be able to find or afford another cylinder on the black market.

This is a familiar story not just in Delhi but also in Noida, Lucknow, Allahabad, Indore and so many other cities where families are desperately cobbling together makeshift arrangements at home.

But most of India’s population cannot afford to do this. There are already several reports of people dying at the doorsteps of hospitals because they couldn’t afford to buy essential drugs and oxygen on the black market.

Chat showing prices of Covid medicines and equipment in the black market

The BBC called several oxygen cylinder suppliers and most of them asked for at least 10 times more than the normal price.

Fake remdesivir has also appeared in the black market. When the BBC questioned a dealer that the drug he was offering seemed fake as the firm manufacturing it wasn’t on the list of the companies licensed to produce it in India, he replied that it was “100% original”.

The world needs to come together to help before India is overwhelmed with this tragedy and starts to break down.

If the Leader of the Opposition Sir Keir Starmer won’t support an inquiry into Boris Johnson’s lies then what hope justice, integrity, and honesty.

Six opposition parties in the Commons are urging the Speaker, Sir Lindsay Hoyle, to allow a vote on an inquiry into Boris Johnson’s “consistent failure to be honest” in statements to MPs.

They want the Speaker, Sir Lindsay Hoyle to let them table a motion saying that Johnson’s conduct should be referred to the committee of privileges, on the grounds that making a deliberately misleading statement to MPs amounts to a contempt of parliament under the Commons rulebook, Erskine May.

Under normal circumstances, with an 80 seat majority, there would be no realistic chance of MPs approving such a motion, however, these are not normal circumstances.

In light of the present situation and the growing public anger at the blatant corruption, cronyism, and sleaze being practiced by politicians, it may well pass the vote if some Tories feel compelled or pressured by their constituents enough to do the right thing or at least force the debate on the question of honesty.

The letter was organised by the Green MP Caroline Lucas and it has been signed by six other parliamentary party leaders: Ian Blackford (Scottish National party), Sir Ed Davey (Liberal Democrats), Liz Saville Roberts (Plaid Cymru), Colum Eastwood (SDLP) and Stephen Farry (Alliance).

Although the motion would not likely pass a debate on this subject – if the Speaker were to allow one – would be highly embarrassing to the prime minister.

Unfortunately, Sir Keir Starmer declined to sign the joint letter from the six other opposition parties calling for an inquiry into the prime minister’s “consistent failure to be honest”.

Starmer refuses to sign the letter to force the question on honesty

The Labour leader, Sir Keir Starmer, was invited to sign the letter, but declined. A party source said Labour did not normally sign up to initiatives launched by other parties.

Diane Abbott MP tweeted: “Baffling that @Keir_Starmer has refused to sign a letter signed off by six other party leaders calling for an inquiry into @BorisJohnson and his lies. Everyone knows Boris is an inveterate liar #BorisJohnsonOut

Baffling that @Keir_Starmer has refused to sign a letter signed off by six other party leaders calling for an inquiry into @BorisJohnson and his lies. Everyone knows Boris is an inveterate liar #BorisJohnsonOut https://t.co/KK0Klakp0H

— Diane Abbott MP (@HackneyAbbott) April 19, 2021

For many who have followed Sir Keir Starmer’s rapid orchestrated rise to the top, this is not a surprise, Starmer has many questions left unanswered from his time has DDP, most certainly those surrounding the attempted extradition of Julian Assange by the Swedish authorities not to mention the waylayed donors from his leadership campaign who all turned out to be the Anti-Corbyn brigade but most obviously the buried #LabourLeaks.

We know where the bodies are buried, only a Barrister could wrap them up in litigation Read more…

Lucas was partly inspired to take action by a video posted on Twitter by the campaigner Peter Stefanovic about what he describes as Johnson’s “lies”. It has attracted more than 11m views.

“It’s hard to recall any prime minister who has treated parliament with the contempt that this one does,” said Lucas.

“There is a normalisation of lying to the house which is deeply dangerous, especially coming from an increasingly authoritarian government which is looking at every means to avoid accountability.”

In their letter, the six MPs express their “deep concern” that the PM’s repeated failure to be truthful is damaging the reputation of the Commons.

They go on: “This is not a question of occasional inaccuracies or a misleading use of figures: it is a consistent failure to be honest with the facts, or to correct wrong information at the earliest opportunity when misleading information is given. This, we believe, amounts to a contempt of the house.”

The letter cites six examples of Johnson giving misleading information to MPs: saying the economy had grown by 73% under the Conservatives, when the figure covered the period since 1990 (including Labour’s term in office); saying CO2 emissions had been cut by 42% since 2010, when the real figure was by 38% since 1990; saying the nurses’ bursary had been restored, when the replacement arrangement is less generous; falsely saying the number of families living in poverty had been cut by 400,000 since 2010; falsely saying Bridgend was going to be a battery manufacturing centre; and saying Covid-related contracts had been published when they had not.

When challenged about comments like this, No 10 will sometimes acknowledge that an error was made, but more usually brushes aside the complaint or argues that Johnson was misunderstood.

Johnson himself almost never corrects the record in the chamber, and Downing Street does not say his record for honesty is problematic – despite the fact that Peter Oborne, who was political editor of the Spectator when Johnson was its editor, has recently published a book, The Assault on Truth, wholly devoted to what he describes as Johnson’s “lies”. Oborne, a political reporter for almost 30 years, says he has never encountered a senior British politician “who lies and fabricates so regularly, so shamelessly and so systematically as … Johnson”.

The opposition MPs want the committee of privileges to investigate Johnson because other avenues of complaint appear closed. Knowingly misleading parliament is against the ministerial code, but only the PM himself can order an inquiry into breaches of the code.

The code of conduct for MPs says “honesty” is one of the values they should respect, but the parliamentary commissioner for standards does not investigate complaints about MPs making false statements in the chamber.

Intentionally misleading MPs could be a contempt of parliament, and contempt allegations can be investigated by the committee of privileges.

But the committee can only launch an investigation after a vote for one by MPs, and it is for the Speaker to decide whether a debate on such a motion can be held.

The Speaker’s office said it would not be commenting on private correspondence with MPs.

In response to the claims from the opposition MPs, a government spokesperson said: “The prime minister follows the ministerial code.”

However, recent events have shown that statement needs qualifying the best way right now is not only another inquiry but some cold hard questions being asked in parliament that we can all witness.

If Starmer has not got the gumption to work out how to oppose the Tories he needs to work with others to do his job if that means signing a joint letter to pressure the speaker into forcing the debate on the question of honesty, then so be it.