Unions respond to Ben Wallace’s rant on public sector pay talks and going back to the 70s

Ben Wallace
Ben Wallace We’re not going back to the 1970s

Ben Wallace rants, We’re not going back to the 1970s

Unite the union responded to Ben Wallace’s comments on public sector pay disputes after Wallace went off on some poor imitation of an Alf Garnet rant about Trade unions seeking to hold the government “to ransom” by demanding direct talks on public sector pay.

After speaking at Manchester airport, where he met military personnel covering for Border Force staff, the defence secretary rejected a charge from the new TUC general secretary, Paul Nowak, that the government was sabotaging efforts to end the strikes.

Wallace rejected Nowak’s call for ministers to join talks, saying they could not override the recommendations of government-appointment pay review bodies, and that unions should instead talk to employers.

“We’re not going back to the 1970s where the trade union barons thought that they ran the government,” Wallace said. “They used to meet in Downing Street and tell the Labour government of the day what they’re going to do. We’re not going to go back to that. We’re not going to be held to ransom.

“The trade unions can negotiate, they can negotiate with their employers and try and come to a resolution. That’s the most important thing. There’s no magic wand here to come up with money that the country doesn’t have.

“Ultimately we’re in a position where we’re trying to listen to the independent advice, through the independent pay bodies, offer a settlement to the workforces and then try and bring that to a resolution. But if the trade union leadership think we’re all just going to ignore these independent bodies to suit their agenda then they’ll be mistaken.”

Ministers have refused to negotiate

Ministers have refused to negotiate on pay, saying they must follow the official recommendations.

But the TUC leader, Paul Nowak, has said the pay review bodies were “in danger of being brought into disrepute”.

Speaking to the BBC’s Today programme this Thursday morning, he said: “The government is hiding behind the pay review bodies, refusing to negotiate on pay and refusing to reach a reasonable settlement with our public sector unions.”

Despite the intense debate, the committees whose members decide the incomes of millions of workers are not high-profile. So who sits on them, and how accountable are they?

Members of the pay review boards are not allowed to discuss their work and their voting records are kept under wraps. Their conclusions are agreed “collectively”, and there is little interrogation by parliament.

Unions have complained they can only make submissions to pay review bodies. Unlike the Low Pay Commission, which sets the level of the minimum wage and counts senior TUC official Kate Bell among its nine commissioners, unions are excluded from having representatives on the pay bodies themselves.

House of Commons select committees have no opportunity to quiz nominated members about their qualifications before they are appointed by the prime minister, as they can with Bank of England policymakers.

There is one former trade union official on the NHS pay review body (NHSPRB), Stephanie Marston. She previously worked for the Prospect union, which covers 100,000 professional workers in the civil service and private sector.

A spokesperson for Prospect said it had no contact with Marston, who quit her union job in 2017.

So are pay review bodies independent or linked to the government?

The pay review bodies are appointed by ministers, but claim to still be independent.

Even so, they have to work to the government’s parameters.

The government says what pay award it is aiming for, determines when it will respond to and publish reports of pay review bodies – and is always aiming for the 2% inflation target meant to keep the economy on an even keel.

They are therefore unlikely to recommend something which ministers will only reject.

So it’s not surprising that Pat Cullen, general secretary of the Royal College of Nursing union, claimed that the NHS pay review body is “set up by government, paid by the government, appointed by government, and the parameters of the review are set by government.”

She added: “There’s nothing independent about the independent pay review body.”

Unite responds to Ben Wallace comments on public sector pay disputes

321455370 586974889935637 7817489892776962671 n
The truth is that it is bandit capitalism that’s holding the country to ransom. -Sharon Graham

Responding to defence minister Ben Wallace’s attack on the trade unions, Sharon Graham Unite general secretary said:

“This government is spinning a web of lies to divert the blame for who is really responsible for the economic crisis engulfing the country. The unions ‘holding the country to ransom’ is another to add to their long list.

“Ben Wallace’s comments are puerile. The truth is that it is bandit capitalism that’s holding the country to ransom. The FT 350 whose profit margins soared 73 per cent during the pandemic; big energy whose £170 billion ’‘excess profits’ are forecast for this year and next; and City bankers’ £33bn excess profits predicted for this year are holding the country to ransom. And they are but a few.

“Government ministers used to applaud NHS workers every Thursday for their courage and sacrifice; now that they are striking to break years of pay freezes they are ‘holding the country to ransom’. This government is presiding over a broken economy that works just for the rich and not for everyday people.”

Support Labour Heartlands


This is a "Pay as You Feel" website.

Hey there! Thanks for stopping by. If you've enjoyed reading the articles on Labour Heartlands so far, We would be incredibly grateful if you could consider making a small donation. Labour Heathlands is not your typical news outlet. We are not here to simply regurgitate the daily news cycle, that's for the rest of them. Our focus is on delving deeper, uncovering the untold stories and shedding light on the issues that the mainstream media chooses to ignore.

Our unwavering commitment to journalistic integrity means that we are not influenced by any external forces. We are not beholden to PR companies, advertisers or press barons, and we refuse to let anyone dictate what we report on. Our editorial independence is sacrosanct, and our only allegiance is to the truth.

While we do not align ourselves with any particular political party, we stand firmly against corruption, injustice and the erosion of truth and the rule of law. We believe that accurate information is the lifeblood of a democracy and that facts are not up for debate.

Once again, thank you for your support – We truly couldn't do this without you!