Westminster have voted against the government’s motion to send the PM back to the EU for final negotiations. The defeat means May has almost no support left to negotiate in Brussels.
After two years of failing to get anything significant regarding Brexit through parliament, the government of Prime Minister Theresa May had launched a last desperate plea on Thursday.
The government’s main motion:
- May hoped to have parliamentarians approve a motion that acknowledges her progress in negotiations with the European Union, voicing support for her to go back to Brussels seeking more amendments to the divorce deal, most likely related to the Irish border backstop.
- The motion was defeated, with 303 voting against and 258 voting in favour.
Now that the motion has failed, May will have almost zero credibility left to continue talks with the EU.
May lost support from both the hard-Leave and hard-Remain factions of her own party, leading to the motion failing.
After the defeat, in a vote that May did not attend, her office said that her government would continue changes to the existing Withdrawal Agreement in Brussels.
“The government will continue to pursue this with the EU to ensure we leave on time on March 29,” the spokesman said. He said May believed that her party still supported her bid to continue negotiating in Brussels, but that they had rejected the motion because they were concerned about taking a “no deal” Brexit off the table at this stage. May’s office also argued that the opposition were in effect making no deal more likely by opposing her plans to work on a Withdrawal Agreement.
Responses to the defeat in Parliament:
Labour leader Jeremy Corbyn said after the defeat that Prime Minister May — who was not in the chamber — might like to come to the podium to “admit her Brexit strategy has failed.”
“Tonight’s vote shows there is no majority for the Prime Minister’s course of action in Brexit,” Corbyn said. “She cannot keep on just running down the clock and hoping that something will turn up that will save her day or save her face.”
The SNP’s Ian Blackford called the vote “a significant defeat for the government,” adding: “At the end of the day, the Prime Minister should be here to accept her responsibilities on the back of this government defeat. Where is she?”
The Liberal Democrats’ Tom Brake asked: “In what way can we as members of Parliament, who have already voted to rule out no deal, can ensure that the government listen to that and respond appropriately?” House Speaker John Bercow responded that this “is a matter of politics, and the politics will play out — and I use that term in a non-perjorative and neutral sense — in the days and weeks ahead, and we will have to see where we get.”
Soon thereafter, the session was adjourned, after Bercow had said “there is an Arsenal match on television very soon” — a reference to his and Corbyn’s favorite football team in action in the Europa League against BATE Borisov.
The three amendments that were voted on before the main event:
- The Labour Party was seeking a requirement to have either a vote on a withdrawal agreement no later that February 27, or a statement saying there was no longer a viable withdrawal agreement and calling on parliament to restart the process. Result: failed by a margin of 322 to 306.
- The Scottish National Party was calling for a postponement of the March 29 Brexit date by at least three months. Result: failed by 315 votes to 93.
- Conservative backbencher and Remain supporter Anna Soubry proposed that the government publish its most recent civil service advice on the consequences of leaving without a deal. Result: withdrawn by Soubry.
Again we see another Tory remainer withdrawing or not supporting their own motions.
PLEASE HELP US KEEP GOING AD-FREE
This is a "Pay as You Feel" website.
Hey there! Thanks for stopping by. If you've enjoyed reading the articles on Labour Heartlands so far, We would be incredibly grateful if you could consider making a small donation. Labour Heathlands is not your typical news outlet. We are not here to simply regurgitate the daily news cycle, that's for the rest of them. Our focus is on delving deeper, uncovering the untold stories and shedding light on the issues that the mainstream media chooses to ignore.
Our unwavering commitment to journalistic integrity means that we are not influenced by any external forces. We are not beholden to PR companies, advertisers or press barons, and we refuse to let anyone dictate what we report on. Our editorial independence is sacrosanct, and our only allegiance is to the truth.
While we do not align ourselves with any particular political party, we stand firmly against corruption, injustice and the erosion of truth and the rule of law. We believe that accurate information is the lifeblood of a democracy and that facts are not up for debate.
Once again, thank you for your support – We truly couldn't do this without you!