EU anti-money laundering Blacklist blocked.

EU money-laundering blacklist
Unanimous majority of European Union member states have moved to block a new EU money-laundering blacklist that includes Saudi Arabia

Plans for a European Union money-laundering blacklist stalled after objections by all but one of the bloc’s 28 governments.

The Commission last month published a list of 23 countries that it says are too lax on money laundering, including Saudi Arabia, Panama, and several American territories such as the U.S. Virgin Islands. The list, which needs the support of both the European Parliament and Council of the EU to come into effect, generated intense backlash and behind-the-scenes lobbying from the U.S. and Saudi Arabia.

A unanimous majority of European Union member states have moved to block a new EU money-laundering blacklist that includes Saudi Arabia and several US territories, following an appeal by Saudi Arabia’s King Salman bin Abdulaziz Al Saud.

The procedure to block the blacklist, which was originally adopted in line with previously-agreed EU rules to prevent money laundering, was launched on Thursday, according to Reuters.

The Financial Times has also reported that 27 of the EU’s total 28 countries, led by the UK, France, Germany, and the Netherlands, have pushed to block publication of the list.

A majority of 21 states is needed to veto the EU blacklisting regulation.

Individual EU states are expected to clarify their positions on the matter in a Friday meeting in the Belgian capital of Brussels. A formal decision will be made in the next two weeks.

EU government representatives agreed to block the blacklist when they meet at a Council meeting, the three diplomats said. EU ambassadors will formalise that decision on Wednesday. The bloc’s home affair ministers would then sign off on the rejection when they meet next Thursday.

Commission deputy chief spokesperson Mina Andreeva told journalists that the EU’s executive arm would only “assess the situation” once this process is completed next week.

“The fact that almost all countries balked at the new blacklist reveals just how diplomatically sensitive the initiative is.


Due Diligence

While the current list may not survive, EU governments have said they’re determined to stamp out dirty money after a series of scandals. Several of the bloc’s biggest banks, including Danske Bank A/SDeutsche Bank AG and Swedbank AB, have been implicated in money-laundering allegations, raising doubts about the quality of supervision and enforcement across the continent.

Under the commission’s proposal, banks and other financial institutions would be required to apply increased due diligence checks on operations involving customers from 23 “high-risk third countries,” including American Samoa, Guam, the U.S. Virgin Islands, Puerto Rico, Saudi Arabia and Panama, to better identify any suspicious money flows.

This was the commission’s first list based on its own methodology, targeting more countries than those named by the Financial Action Task Force, a Paris-based global watchdog. A country was added if “strategic deficiencies” in its anti-money-laundering framework were identified.

“The rejection of the governments is a farce at the expense of security,” EU lawmaker Sven Giegold said in a statement. “France and the U.K. want to remove Saudi Arabia and other countries from the list. Spain is protecting Panama. The United States is exerting massive pressure because four U.S. jurisdictions,” he said.

EU Anti-Tax Avoidance Directive The measure will have effect in the UK from 1 January 2019.

The Anti Tax Avoidance Directive
The Anti Tax Avoidance Directive

The remain camp just like the Leaver camp in the UK is not adverse to perpetuating lies you will often see post from conspiracies that the only reason we had a referendum was for the rich to avoid the EU Anti-Tax Avoidance Directive fortunately that’s all they were conspiracies. The noose is tightening and would tighten more so under a Labour run HMRC

European Union (EU) Anti-Tax Avoidance Directive (ATAD) are transposed into UK tax law as required. Although the UK is scheduled to leave the EU on 29 March 2019 and the Withdrawal Agreement has not yet been finalized, it is expected that the UK will need to comply with the ATAD requirements at least throughout any transition period agreed. Consequently, the UK is proposing to implement any changes that would be required to be brought in by the ATAD by 1 January 2019 (when the UK will still be within the EU) or 1 January 2020 (which is expected to be within the transition period). Requirements that must be implemented by a later date are still under review.

The ATAD sets out a requirement for Member States to adopt certain anti-avoidance provisions to facilitate the creation of a ”level playing field” across the EU. The UK Government has assessed the ATAD requirements against the existing tax legislation and has concluded that changes are required in the following areas:

Controlled foreign company rules, which need to be applied with effect from 1 January 2019

Exit taxation rules (in particular, the deferral mechanisms applicable in certain circumstances), which need to be applied from 1 January 2020
Certain anti-hybrid rules, which need to be applied from 1 January 2020 (other ”reverse hybrid” changes are required by 1 January 2022 and are still under review)
The consultation on the draft legislation will run until 31 August 2018 and measures are intended to be included in what will become Finance Act 2019.

Support Labour Heartlands


This is a "Pay as You Feel" website.

Hey there! Thanks for stopping by. If you've enjoyed reading the articles on Labour Heartlands so far, We would be incredibly grateful if you could consider making a small donation. Labour Heathlands is not your typical news outlet. We are not here to simply regurgitate the daily news cycle, that's for the rest of them. Our focus is on delving deeper, uncovering the untold stories and shedding light on the issues that the mainstream media chooses to ignore.

Our unwavering commitment to journalistic integrity means that we are not influenced by any external forces. We are not beholden to PR companies, advertisers or press barons, and we refuse to let anyone dictate what we report on. Our editorial independence is sacrosanct, and our only allegiance is to the truth.

While we do not align ourselves with any particular political party, we stand firmly against corruption, injustice and the erosion of truth and the rule of law. We believe that accurate information is the lifeblood of a democracy and that facts are not up for debate.

Once again, thank you for your support – We truly couldn't do this without you!