Labour’s War on the Disabled Puts Tory Cuts to Shame

From Opposition to Oppressor:  Starmer’s Benefit Cuts Target Disabled & Poor Families

Remember when Sir Keir Starmer, that paragon of principled opposition, stood in the Commons and denounced the Tories’ £20 Universal Credit cut as “indefensible,” “unfair,” and “unacceptable”? How his voice quivered with righteous indignation as he championed the vulnerable against Conservative cruelty?

What hollow performance that was. With the government benches still warm from those pampered Tory behinds, Starmer has revealed his true colours, not red, but the deepest, darkest blue. The Wolf of Westminster has shed his sheep’s clothing, and his first meal is the disabled and the poor.

The Scale of Betrayal: Worse Than We Thought

Documents obtained by the Guardian through Freedom of Information requests reveal the truly monstrous scale of Labour’s planned assault on the disabled. Internal Department for Work and Pensions forecasts show that 700,000 families already living in poverty will be hammered by Starmer’s disability benefit cuts.

Let that sink in. These aren’t families teetering on the edge of hardship, these are people already drowning beneath the poverty line. And Labour’s response is to tie concrete blocks to their ankles.

This 700,000 figure comes in addition to the 250,000 people who will be newly dragged into poverty by these cuts, as the government’s own impact assessment admitted in March. That’s nearly a million families sacrificed on the altar of fiscal rectitude by a Party that once claimed to represent the vulnerable.

What the Cuts Mean in Real Terms

This is austerity wrapped up with a red rosette. We should be used to the lies. The deceit. The act. He's just another political psychopath lacking empathy. The Labour manifesto promised to "make work pay" and ensure "security for those who cannot work." pic.twitter.com/a2b8mx44Ib

— Labour Heartlands (@Labourheartland) May 11, 2025

The DWP estimates that 3.2 million families across Great Britain will lose out under the plans in 2029/2030, about three years after the cuts are due to take effect. Of those, 700,000 will be families already categorised as being in relative poverty, when taking housing costs into account.

For disabled people who cannot work and rely on the health-related top-up of Universal Credit, Labour’s plan is brutally simple: freeze their benefits below inflation, eroding their already meagre incomes in real terms year after year. For new claimants, the situation is even more dire, their top-up will be slashed by almost half.

The proposed PIP “four-point rule” alone will rob 250,000 families already in poverty of £4,500 a year on average by 2030. Among them are 50,000 families with children, who will watch their parents struggle even more desperately to put food on the table.

And in a particularly cruel twist, the figures don’t even account for those who will lose Carer’s Allowance because the person they care for no longer qualifies for PIP. These invisible victims, often women sacrificing careers to care for loved ones, don’t even merit counting in Labour’s brutal calculus.

Poverty as Policy

“Being disabled already puts you at a higher risk of living in poverty,” says Katie Schmuecker of the Joseph Rowntree Foundation, stating what should be blindingly obvious to anyone with a functioning moral compass. “These cuts are likely to mean many more disabled people needing to regularly use food banks because they can’t afford basic essentials like food.”

This isn’t an unintended consequence, it’s the policy working exactly as designed. While Labour throws crumbs to non-disabled Universal Credit recipients with a modest above-inflation increase of about £400 annually, they’re taking thousands from those least able to weather such losses.

The message couldn’t be clearer: if you’re disabled in Starmer’s Britain, you’re an acceptable sacrifice. Your suffering is a rounding error on a budget spreadsheet, your hunger a necessary adjustment in the fiscal forecast.

From Opposition to Oppressor

What makes this betrayal particularly sickening is the breathtaking speed of Starmer’s transformation from defender to persecutor. The man who once claimed to stand for “those who are just managing to get by” now orchestrates an assault on the vulnerable that makes the Tories’ £20 cut look positively charitable by comparison.

Remember when Starmer, that paragon of principled opposition, stood in the Commons and denounced the Tories' £20 UC cut as indefensible, unfair, and unacceptable?
What hollow performance that was. 700,000 families living in poverty will be hammered by his disability benefit cuts pic.twitter.com/VKbXd2QoO3

— Labour Heartlands (@Labourheartland) May 11, 2025

The Labour manifesto promised to “make work pay” and ensure “security for those who cannot work.” Ten months into power, and Starmer has ripped up these commitments with the same cold efficiency with which he dismantled his leadership campaign pledges.

Svetlana Kotova, director of campaigns and justice at Inclusion London, a deaf and disabled people’s organisation, said: “These statistics are further evidence of how much misery the government is willing to inflict on disabled people who are already living in poverty.

“Poverty costs money and displaces costs on to other services like the NHS, meaning that the cuts to social security may achieve only 2% of their planned savings.”

MPs will vote on these cuts next month, clearing the way for implementation next year. The question now is whether those Labour backbenchers who once wept crocodile tears over Tory austerity will find their conscience, or whether party discipline will trump basic humanity.

If there’s any justice, the millions of families being driven deeper into poverty won’t forget this betrayal when election time comes again. But perhaps that’s Starmer’s cynical calculation, that by the time the next ballot comes around, many will be too busy surviving to remember who put the boot in.

The Joseph Rowntree Foundation’s verdict is damning: “The government must stop these planned cuts if it’s committed to ending the moral scar of food bank use.” But there’s the rub, this government has no such commitment. Its only commitment is to its donors, to the markets, and to maintaining the façade of fiscal responsibility while the most vulnerable in society pay the price.

Indefensible. Unfair. Unacceptable. Starmer’s own words now stand as the perfect indictment of his government’s cruelty.