Labour’s Manifesto: Lost opportunities, lost possibilities

Opportunities can define a political Party, even the ones they miss.

The launch of Labour’s Manifesto today only intensifies a tragic sense of missed opportunity.

Instead of sailing into battle with the wind behind us in transforming our political and economic settlement in favour of workers and those most abused and neglected by the domination of the rich and the most advantaged, we have the wind against us and there is a gaping hole in our ship.

Our manifesto is committed to nationalising water and rail and providing free broadband for all.

It has an industrial strategy based around renewing skilled work and redistributing investment to the neglected parts of our country. Its training programme is linked to the building of homes and integrated with the renewal of skills.

It would challenge the domination of the oligarchs and redistribute power and wealth. Labour would build homes and a home for a wide coalition of people who have been excluded from participation and provide the basis of both a shared common future and a reckoning with the past forty years through a new settlement based on greater equality and participation.

Labour would be a beacon for the moribund European Left on how to lead a democratic socialist politics that brings together locals and immigrants, north and south, women and
men through a politics that rejects the domination of the market in the organisation of society and overcomes division through a new class politics. For the many not the few and for the first time in a long time, the rich would pay. Boris Johnson would be a symbol of a narcissistic entitled elite who have no shame or obligation and Labour would be a power in the land once more.

But it can’t. And it won’t.

Whereas last time Labour said that it would respect the result of the Referendum and people believed it. This time they won’t.

The nature of the Maastricht and then Lisbon Treaties, with their very specific prohibition on interferences with competition (nationalisation) and on State Aid (industrial policy) means that Labour’s manifesto would be vigorously challenged by capital through the European Court of Justice, and that capital would win. As in Greece and Spain, democracy would be subordinated to Treaty Law.

Even Labour’s housing policy relying on state investment and the training and priority of local labour would run counter to EU rules on competition and state interference in markets. Article 106 states that interference is only justified because of ‘necessity’. A political decision is not enough.

The Labour leadership’s refusal to make the distinction between globalisation and internationalism and present a vision of solidarity to defy the ownership of the world by those who own capital it appears to be in bad faith. By refusing to assert that democracy is the way we resist capitalism and that legal treaties only entrench its rule Labour has not built the coalition between the working class and the progressive middle-class that has always been the basis of its power.

Instead large numbers of working class Labour voters, who understand that leaving the EU is central to their interests are either not voting or voting for the Conservatives, who are at least committed to leaving the EU.

Opportunities can define a political Party, even the ones they miss.

Jeremy Corbyn’s Labour had a chance at this election to redirect the history of our country in a socialist and democratic direction that would have transformed it for a generation. Because of their refusal to name the European Union for what it is, a capitalist machine that subordinates democracy, many people are not listening to our manifesto commitments because they do not believe we can deliver on them. The sacred bond of trust that has existed for generations has been ruptured.

“I will continue to campaign for Labour over the next month because it is better than any alternative, but I do so with the cold wind in my face rather than my back.”

For Labour Heartlands By Maurice Glasman.
Baron Glasman is an English political theorist, academic, social commentator, and Labour life peer in the House of Lords. He is a senior lecturer in Political Theory at London Metropolitan University and Director of its Faith and Citizenship Programme.

Support Labour Heartlands


This is a "Pay as You Feel" website.

Hey there! Thanks for stopping by. If you've enjoyed reading the articles on Labour Heartlands so far, We would be incredibly grateful if you could consider making a small donation. Labour Heathlands is not your typical news outlet. We are not here to simply regurgitate the daily news cycle, that's for the rest of them. Our focus is on delving deeper, uncovering the untold stories and shedding light on the issues that the mainstream media chooses to ignore.

Our unwavering commitment to journalistic integrity means that we are not influenced by any external forces. We are not beholden to PR companies, advertisers or press barons, and we refuse to let anyone dictate what we report on. Our editorial independence is sacrosanct, and our only allegiance is to the truth.

While we do not align ourselves with any particular political party, we stand firmly against corruption, injustice and the erosion of truth and the rule of law. We believe that accurate information is the lifeblood of a democracy and that facts are not up for debate.

Once again, thank you for your support – We truly couldn't do this without you!